ReviewCurrent HIV research2026
The RV144 Trial Might Still Yield Useful Information.
Review in Current HIV research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article discusses how the RV144 Phase 3 HIV-1 vaccine trial conducted over 15 years ago impacted the subsequent direction of research intended to create and evaluate vaccines with potentially greater efficacy. Follow-on Phase 2b and Phase 3 trials directly or indirectly inspired by the modest efficacy reported for the RV144 trial have not shown any significant protection against HIV-1 acquisition. No credibly protective new immunogens have emerged from the Correlates of Protection (CoP) or Risk (CoR) analyses conducted after RV144-inspired studies in either humans or various macaque models. Notably, the RV144 trial did not induce neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), only non-NAbs. However, only NAbs have been shown to be protective in macaque models. One possible but underappreciated explanation for the outcome of the RV144 trial could be trained innate immune responses against the non-HIV-1 canarypox virus vector antigens, considering the placebo group only received saline. In this article, the author outlines how monkey model research based directly or indirectly on the RV144 trial could still yield useful information on the possible role of trained immunity in short-term vaccine protection. However, non-human primate research, in general, should now focus on testing new immunogens that have a reasonable chance of inducing NAbs in humans, rather than expending more resources on CoP/CoR studies inspired by the RV144 trial and its follow-ups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40257015What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.