ArticleChild: care, health and development2025
Beyond the Label: Antipsychotic Prescribing Practices at a Paediatric Neurodisability Service in Australia.
Article in Child: care, health and development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medication profiles of patients undergoing dental treatment under general anesthesia or sedation in special needs dentistry.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of antipsychotic medications in children has been increasing in Australia and abroad. Children with complex physical and neurodevelopmental disability remain understudied in the prescribing literature, and we do not have a nuanced understanding of why and to whom antipsychotic medications are prescribed.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of records to characterise antipsychotic prescription patterns for children with neurodisability at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. We used the Electronic Medical Record to identify children under 19 years, newly prescribed an antipsychotic medication by Department of Neurodevelopment and Disability clinicians between 24/09/2018 and 26/09/2022. We identified 167 encounters for 147 patients, representing 4% (147/3673) of the patients seen in that period. Main outcome measures were the frequency of antipsychotic medication prescription by drug, age category and sex; indication frequency; proportion of off-label use; and frequency and level of psychotropic polypharmacy.
resultsIn our cohort, 71% of children had intellectual disability (104/147), 42% autism spectrum disorder (61/147) and 42% cerebral palsy (61/147). Risperidone was the most prescribed antipsychotic medication, in 64% (107/167), followed by olanzapine in 18% (32/167). Off-label prescription was 62% (66/107) for risperidone, 97% (31/32) for olanzapine. The indication for antipsychotic medication was challenging behaviour in 74% (123/167), including aggression in 31% (52/167), agitation in 20% (33/167) and self-injury in 17% (28/167). Nonbehavioural indications included anxiety symptoms in 19% (32/167) and sleep disorders in 14% (24/167). Psychotropic polypharmacy (two or more concurrent psychotropic medications) was present in 78% (130/167), with sedatives (69%, 115/167) and antidepressants (31%, 52/167) most common.
conclusionsA small proportion of children with neurodisability were prescribed antipsychotic medications, most frequently risperidone for challenging behaviours. Off-label prescription and psychotropic polypharmacy were common. Prescription occurred in a variety of clinical scenarios that sit outside the current field of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.