Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256829›Full record

ReviewChemSusChem2025

Mg Plating in Nonethereal Electrolyte Solutions: Fact or Misconception?

Toshihiko Mandai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemSusChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Toshihiko MandaiFunctional Electrolyte Synthesis Team, Research Center for Energy and Environmental Materials (GREEN), National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0044, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2403-7794

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJGX23S1NEXT Center of Innovation Program JPMJPF2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rechargeable Mg metal batteries (RMMBs) have garnered significant attention due to their outstanding electrochemical energy storage performance. Ether solvents are widely used as a primary component of RMMB electrolytes because of their excellent compatibility with Mg metal. However, the poor anodic stability of ethers hinders the development of high-energy-density RMMBs. To address this limitation, researchers have explored novel electrolyte formulations based on nonethereal solvents. However, the interpretation of reported results remains controversial due to a lack of solid experimental evidence confirming Mg plating reactions in such media. This article provides an overview of Mg electrochemistry in both ethereal and nonethereal electrolyte systems. Comprehensive cyclic voltammetry studies on the electrochemical Mg plating/stripping activity in various electrolyte systems reaffirm that only a limited range of solvents-including ethers, amines, and dialkylsulfones-support reversible Mg plating/stripping. In contrast, Mg plating is rarely observed in nitrile, amide, carbonate, and phosphate electrolytes, despite voltammograms exhibiting seemingly reversible responses. These findings caution researchers against assuming voltammetric responses correspond to Mg plating/stripping without solid evidence of Mg deposits. Finally, a protocol for assessing whether proposed (uncommon) electrolyte systems genuinely support Mg plating/stripping is presented.

Indexed as

decompositionsMg platingnonethereal electrolyte solutions

Identifiers

PMID40256829
PMCPMC12302337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.