Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256819›Full record

ReviewJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2025

Current Landscape of Short-T2 Imaging Techniques in the Musculoskeletal System: The Past, Present and Future.

Pranjal Rai, Amit Kumar Janu, Nitin Shetty, Suyash Kulkarni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Current Uses for Medical Imaging With Orthopaedic Implant Technology.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pranjal RaiDepartment of Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3796-8273
Amit Kumar JanuDepartment of Radiology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Nitin ShettyDepartment of Radiology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Suyash KulkarniDepartment of Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional MRI is limited in imaging tissues with short T2 relaxation times, such as bone, ligaments, and cartilage, due to their rapid signal decay. This limitation has spurred the development of specialized MRI techniques designed specifically for short-T2 tissue imaging. Traditional pulse sequences, including three-dimensional gradient echo (3D-GRE), susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), and Fast Field Echo Resembling a CT using Restricted Echo-Spacing (FRACTURE), initially addressed some of these challenges but often lacked sufficient resolution or contrast differentiation. Recent advancements, such as ultrashort echo time (UTE), zero echo time (ZTE), 3D-Bone, and synthetic computed tomography (sCT), have significantly enhanced the diagnostic capabilities of MRI by providing high-quality, CT-like visualization without exposure to ionizing radiation. These innovations have substantially improved MRI's ability to depict bone morphology, assess joint pathology, identify subtle fractures, and characterize bone tumors with higher accuracy. Beyond musculoskeletal applications, these techniques have demonstrated emerging clinical utility in additional domains, including pulmonary and dental imaging. This review article evaluates conventional pulse sequences alongside emerging MRI innovations, highlighting their clinical applications, current limitations, and technical considerations. Continued optimization of these techniques promises broader clinical adoption, potentially reducing dependence on invasive and radiation-intensive imaging modalities. Evidence Level: N/A Technical Efficacy: Stage 3.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMusculoskeletal DiseasesMusculoskeletal SystemForecastingHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalTomography, X-Ray ComputedBlack‐bone imagingCT‐like bone contrastFRACTURE sequenceshort‐T2 imagingsusceptibility weighted imagingsynthetic CTultrashort Echo timezero Echo time

Identifiers

PMID40256819
PMCPMC12435157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.