Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256790›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Metapopulation distribution shapes year-round overlap with fisheries for a circumpolar seabird.

Kalinka Rexer-Huber, Thomas A Clay, Paulo Catry, Igor Debski, Graham Parker, Raül Ramos, Bruce C Robertson, Peter G Ryan, Paul M Sagar, Andrew Stanworth and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Metapopulation distribution shapes year-round overlap with fisheries for a circumpolar seabird.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kalinka Rexer-HuberDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3345-7990
Thomas A ClayInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0644-6105
Paulo CatryMarine and Environmental Sciences Centre (MARE)/ARNET - Aquatic Research Network, Ispa - Instituto Universitário, Lisbon, Portugal.
Igor DebskiAquatic Unit, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand.
Graham ParkerDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.
Raül RamosDepartament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0551-8605
Bruce C RobertsonDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.
Peter G RyanFitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Western Cape, South Africa.
Paul M SagarNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd., Wellington, New Zealand.
Andrew StanworthFalklands Conservation, Stanley, Falkland Islands, UK.
David R ThompsonNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd., Wellington, New Zealand.
Geoffrey N TuckThe Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Environment Business Unit, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Henri WeimerskirchCentre d'Étude Biologique de Chizé, UMR 7273 CNRS - Université de La Rochelle, Villiers-en-Bois, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-586X
Richard A PhillipsBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.

Funding

BAS Polar Science for Planet Earth Programme, UKDepartment of Conservation, New ZealandFalkland Islands GovernmentFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal LA/P/0069/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal UIDB/04292/2020Institut Polaire Français Paul-Emile Victor, FranceJS Watson TrustMinistry of Primary Industries, New Zealand PRO2006-01National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, New ZealandNatural Environment Research Council, UKNew Zealand Federation of Graduate WomenSouth African National Antarctic ProgrammeUniversity of Otago
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although fisheries bycatch is the greatest threat to many migratory marine megafauna, it remains unclear how population exposure to bycatch varies across the global range of threatened species. Such assessments across multiple populations are crucial for understanding variation in impacts and for identifying the management bodies responsible for reducing bycatch. Here, we combine extensive biologging data from white-chinned petrel (Procellaria aequinoctialis) populations (representing >98% of their global breeding population) with pelagic and demersal longline and trawl fishing effort to map the global distribution and fisheries-overlap hotspots for the most bycaught seabird in the Southern Hemisphere. We tracked the year-round movements of 132 adults in 2006-2018 and examined spatial overlap among seven populations comprising three genetically distinct groupings (metapopulations). Foraging areas during the nonbreeding season were more concentrated than during breeding, with birds from all populations migrating to continental shelf or upwelling zones, but with low spatial overlap among metapopulations. Fisheries overlap differed more among than within metapopulations, underlining that these should be considered separate management units. Overlap with pelagic longline fisheries was greatest for Indian Ocean populations, and from the fleets of South Africa, Japan, Taiwan, and Spain, off southern Africa and in the High Seas. Overlap with demersal longline and trawl fisheries was greatest for Indian and Atlantic Ocean populations, within the Exclusive Economic Zones of South Africa, Namibia, and Argentina, and with the South Korean demersal longline fleet in the High Seas. The high overlap with South Korean longliners in the southwest Atlantic Ocean is of particular concern as demersal fishing in this region is not covered by any Regional Fisheries Management Organization (RFMO). We also identified fisheries-overlap hotspots within RFMOs where there are no seabird-bycatch mitigation requirements (1.5%-53.1% of total overlap within the area of competence of each RFMO), or where current mitigation regulations need to be strengthened. Our recommendations are that management bodies target the high-priority fisheries we have identified for improved bycatch monitoring, mandatory best-practice bycatch mitigation, and close monitoring of compliance, given the conservation concerns for white-chinned petrels and other threatened seabirds.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionBirdsFisheriesAnimal MigrationAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesPopulation Dynamicsbiologgingbycatch mitigationgeolocatorlongline fisheriesmigratory connectivityRegional Fisheries Management Organizationtrawl fisherieswhite‐chinned petrel

Identifiers

PMID40256790
PMCPMC12010314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.