ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Global trends in men's and women's acceptance of intimate partner violence, 1999-2022: an analysis of population-based survey data from 83 countries.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can men's violence reporting behavior be improved? Evidence from a couples-based cluster randomized controlled trial in Tanzania.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- Development and Preliminary Evaluation of iCanPlan: A Mobile Health Application for Intimate Partner Violence Prevention in Thailand.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Trends in the acceptability and prevalence of intimate partner violence: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys, 1999-2024.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Correlates of attitudes toward wife beating among married/partnered individuals in Lao PDR: results from the 2023 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Intimate partner violence during pregnancy against 601,534 women aged 15 to 49 years in 57 LMICs: prevalence, disparities, trends and associated factors using Demographic and Health Survey data.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a pervasive public health issue affecting women worldwide. Attitudes about the acceptability of IPV are correlated with IPV perpetration, experience, and help-seeking; therefore, monitoring trends in attitudes is an important way to track progress towards gender equality. This study presents the most comprehensive assessment of global trends in IPV acceptance to date. Methods: Using population-based surveys including 4.37 million women and 1.22 million men across 83 countries (1999-2022), we modeled average yearly changes in the percentage of women and men with permissive IPV attitudes at the country, world region, and global levels, as well as by age group (≤25 and > 25 years). Findings: Broad variation in the acceptability of IPV was observed in men's (range = 2%-85%) and women's attitudes (range = 2%-92%) across countries. Women tended to be more accepting than men at both earlier and more recent timepoints. On average, the percentage of individuals responding that IPV was acceptable in at least one circumstance decreased significantly over time for men (3.79% [-5.02%, -2.57%]/year) and women (6.80% [-7.83%, -5.77%]/year), with no substantive differences by age group. Interpretation: The acceptability of IPV has declined substantially in the last 20 years, especially among women. Heterogeneity in changes in IPV-related attitudes across countries suggests that pooled estimates should be interpreted cautiously and that national or subnational trends may be more informative. Future research should investigate specific country- and local-level factors that may be driving changes in IPV-supportive attitudes. Funding: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (5R00HD104896).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.