Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256742›Full record

SynthesisPeerJ2025

Understanding trends in

Hannah R Lyford, Emma Guerrini Romano, Shayna A Sura, Sarah Joy Bittick

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah R LyfordDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, & Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America.
Emma Guerrini RomanoBiology Department, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Shayna A SuraDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Sarah Joy BittickBiology Department, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Seagrass meadows are ecologically significant habitats that are globally threatened. Thus, there is increased interest in conservation of seagrasses as they face widespread decline. Biotic and abiotic factors that influence seagrass can be classified as stressors, such as rising temperature and eutrophication. Our study met an imminent need to consolidate data from previous studies to discern knowledge gaps and identify trends in studies, stressors, species, and geographic origination of research for the genus Methodology: We included articles that focused on stressors associated with Results: We screened 7,331 titles and abstracts and extracted data from 1,098 full-text articles. We found nutrients, temperature, and light were the most studied stressors. The United States of America produced the most articles in our review, followed by Australia. Conclusion: Undertaking a review of global studies allowed us to assess more seagrass articles for a single genus than any prior systematic review, summarizing a breadth of stressor studies related to the

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalZosteraceaeConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEutrophicationCoastal ecosystemGlobalResponse variablesSeagrassStressorsSystematic reviewZostera

Identifiers

PMID40256742
PMCPMC12009562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.