ArticlePeerJ2025
Anesthesia videos in geriatric and elderly patients on YouTube: content, quality, reliability, and usefulness assessment.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the quality, reliability, content, and usefulness of YouTube videos related to anesthesia in geriatric and elderly patients. Methods: Using Google Trends, the most popular search terms in the past five years, "geriatric anesthesia" and "anesthesia in the elderly," were identified. A search on YouTube using these terms initially yielded 200 of the most viewed videos for each term. After applying exclusion criteria, 87 videos were included for detailed analysis. Major themes and topics related to anesthesia in geriatric and elderly patients were identified using a pre-determined qualitative thematic analysis method. The usefulness of the videos was assessed using the specially developed Geriatric and Elderly Anesthesia Usefulness Score (GAEUS). The overall quality and reliability of the videos were evaluated using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the Modified DISCERN Scale (M-DISCERN), respectively. The average of the quality, reliability, and usefulness scores calculated by the researchers was used for consistency analysis. Results: In our study, 48.3% (42) of the videos on geriatric and elderly patients concerning anesthesia on YouTube were created by personal blogs. The quality of the videos was measured using the GQS, with a mean score of 3.34 and a median of 3 (range: 1-5), showing no significant difference according to the video source ( Conclusion: In our study, we examined YouTube videos covering anesthesia topics for geriatric and elderly patients. The highest usefulness scores were obtained from personal blogs; however, all sources generally showed low usefulness. The quality of the videos was assessed using the GQS, and their reliability was evaluated with the M-DISCERN. On both scales, the videos showed moderate performance across all sources. These findings indicate a need for more comprehensive and informative content on YouTube, especially for the education of healthcare professionals and patients. To better address the needs of elderly patients, the richness of content and educational value of these videos should be enhanced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.