Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256693›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025

Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain and healing following root canal obturation with calcium silicate and bioactive glass-based sealers to epoxy resin-based sealers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vibha Rahul Hegde, Sanitra Rahul Hegde, Ushaina Eruch Fanibunda, Meghana Aditya Vartak

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07307807 (Evaluation of Postoperative Pain and Lesion Healing in Periapical Lesion-Affected Teeth Obturated With Different Root Canal Sealers), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07307807 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Evaluation of Postoperative Pain and Lesion Healing in Periapical Lesion-Affected Teeth Obturated With Different Root Canal Sealers: Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsRoot Canal Obturation, Apical PeriodontitisArmsAH Plus and PAI 2-3, AH Plus and PAI 4, TotalFill BC Sealer and PAI 2-3, TotalFill BC Sealer and PAI 4
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Bioceramic versus conventional endodontic sealers: An umbrella review.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative evaluation of pushout bond strength of three different sealers: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vibha Rahul HegdeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, YMT Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sanitra Rahul HegdeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, YMT Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Ushaina Eruch FanibundaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, YMT Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Meghana Aditya VartakDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, YMT Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To compare the postoperative pain and healing following obturation with calcium silicate and bioactive glass-based sealers to epoxy resin sealers. Materials and Methods: A systematic search (2018-2024) was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (PRISMA). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2 tool and quality was evaluated using GRADE. Twenty-three studies were included for qualitative analysis and 11 for quantitative analysis, including meta-analysis for bioactive glass and epoxy resin-based sealers. Results: Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in pain occurrence between groups at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days. Similarly, for bioactive glass sealer, no significant difference in pain occurrence was observed at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days. Conclusion: Calcium-silicate-based sealers showed comparable and satisfactory results to epoxy resin sealers regarding postoperative pain incidence and intensity. In addition, they facilitated improved healing of periapical tissues. Notably, bioactive glass-based sealer also demonstrated exceptional properties, offering enhanced benefits.

Indexed as

Bioceramiccalcium-silicateepoxy resinhealingpostoperative painsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40256693
PMCPMC12007741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.