ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with wedge shaped non-carious cervical lesions using different types of esthetic post: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fracture strength evaluation for different posts in endodontically treated teeth.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Background of the study: Conventionally, postcore and crown foundation systems have been employed for restoring endodontically treated teeth (ETT). Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance of ETT with wedge-shaped noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using different types of esthetic posts. Technique: Forty maxillary first premolars possessing two root canals have been randomly divided into four groups ( Results: A one-way analysis of variance/Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to compare the outcome variables between the study groups, which showed Group III's fracture resistance was noticeably greater than Group I. Finally, there has been a substantial difference ( Conclusion: Maxillary premolars with NCCLs that were repaired endodontically utilizing PFCs showed higher fracture resistance than maxillary premolars without posts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.