Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256680›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2025

A fully integrated whole-head helium OPM MEG: a performance assessment compared to cryogenic MEG.

Maxime Bonnet, Denis Schwartz, Tjerk Gutteling, Sebastien Daligault, Etienne Labyt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Expanding the toolkit: OPMs for studying the developing brain.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Potential ofEpilepsia open · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maxime BonnetLyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM UMRS 1028, CNRS UMR5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Denis SchwartzLyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM UMRS 1028, CNRS UMR5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Tjerk GuttelingLyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM UMRS 1028, CNRS UMR5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Sebastien DaligaultLyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM UMRS 1028, CNRS UMR5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Etienne LabytMAG4Health, Grenoble, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neuroimaging technique that measures neuronal activity at a millisecond scale. A few years ago, a new generation of MEG sensors emerged: optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs). The most common OPMs use alkali atoms as the sensing element. These alkali OPM sensors must be heated to approximately 150°C, in contrast to classical MEG sensors [superconducting quantum interference device MEG], which need to be cooled down to -269°C. This article focuses on a new kind of OPM that uses Helium-4 gas as the sensing element, which solves some disadvantages of alkali OPMs.

Indexed as

helium OPMMEGneuroimagingOPMsimulationSQUID

Identifiers

PMID40256680
PMCPMC12006120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.