ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Targeting All Multiple Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prostate Lesions Does Not Enhance Cancer Detection: Insights from the YAU Prostate Cancer Group.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transition from Transrectal Systematic to Transperineal Lesion-Focused Prostate Biopsy: A Real-World Comparative Analysis.Cancers · 2026Article
- The Added Value of Systematic Biopsy in Biopsy-Naïve Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy.Research and reports in urology · 2026Article
- Detection Rates of Prostate Cancer Across Prostatic Zones Using Freehand Single-Access Transperineal Fusion Biopsies.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Although diagnostic efficacy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying index lesions (ILs) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients is well established, challenges arise when multiple lesions (MLs) are present. Determination of an optimal biopsy strategy for these patients is crucial. This study aims to assess the risk of detecting PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa; International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade group ≥2) when targeting suspicious MRI MLs in addition to the IL. Methods: We included 1310 biopsy-naïve patients with only a single MRI lesion (SL) and 621 men with MLs. Patients underwent a subsequent targeted biopsy (TBx) of each lesion, along with a systematic biopsy (SBx). We compared TBx alone versus TBx + SBx and evaluated whether the presence of MLs increases the risk of PCa and csPCa using a multivariable logistic regression model (MVA), while accounting for confounders. Key findings and limitations: Overall, PCa was detected in 57.6% and 51.2% of IL-TBx for the SL and ML groups, respectively ( Conclusions and clinical implications: Patients with MLs have a lower risk of PCa and csPCa. In case of MLs, a TBx of the IL + a concomitant SBx allows for the diagnosis of the vast majority of PCa and csPCa cases. The added value of a second TBx on the non-IL is modest, including only a 5.6% increase in the diagnosis of csPCa. Patient summary: We studied whether targeting multiple suspicious areas on prostate magnetic resonance imaging increases cancer detection. We found that patients with multiple lesions had a lower risk of prostate cancer than those with a single lesion. Targeting the largest suspicious area along with sampling the entire prostate led to the detection of most cancer cases, with little added benefit from targeting the other smaller areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.