SynthesisPublic health reviews2025
Advancing Mammographic Screening Among Underserved Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Strategies to Increase Breast Cancer Screening Uptake.
Synthesis in Public health reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07472036 (Equity in Breast Cancer Screening in Flanders), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Equity in Breast Cancer Screening in Flanders: the Necessity of Tailored Reminders for Women With Low Socioeconomic Status
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building Engagement Using Financial Incentives for Colorectal Cancer Screening (BENEFIT-C) in a Rural Louisiana Federally Qualified Health Center.Health services research · 2026Trial
- Prostate Cancer Mortality in Men not Attending a Population-based Screening Program: The 'Good', the 'Bad', and the 'Ugly' After 20-yr Follow-up in the European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Social support and country-level factors associated with cancer screening participation in 18 European countries: a multilevel analysis of the European Health Interview Survey.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Implementing women's sexual and reproductive health interventions in prisons: a realist review.BMJ open · 2026Review
- Evidence-based Interventions for Cancer Screening Access among People with Physical and/or Sensory Disability: a Systematic Review of the Evidence.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Breast cancer (BC) is a leading cause of cancer related disability and mortality. Despite efforts to implement mammography screening programs, uptake rates vary widely due to socioeconomic factors and accessibility challenges. To improve participation, interventions targeting barriers faced by underserved groups are crucial for promoting equitable screening and early detection. Methods: A systematic search and meta-analysis was performed to identify strategies to reduce disparities and enhance participation in BC screening, with particular attention to underserved groups, including individuals with low SES, underinsured, with immigrant background or part of ethnic minority. Results: The meta-analysis of 44 randomized studies involving 161,141 individuals (of which 14,720 belonged to underserved groups) showed that, compared to usual care, interventions regarding BC screening were effective in increasing mammography uptake [pooled OR 1.55 (95%CI 1.39-1.73)], particularly, among underserved groups [pooled OR 1.81 (95%CI 1.43-2.28)]. Overall, the most effective were educational interventions. Among underserved groups, reminders, telephonic interventions, navigation services and cultural-sensitive approaches were highly effective. Conclusion: Combining these strategies can simultaneously address multiple barriers, ensuring comprehensive support throughout the BC screening process and improved access to screening for underserved groups. Systematic Review Registration: Identifier CRD42023393352.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.