ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2025
Improving efficiency of a rheumatology outpatient clinic through classification of newly referred patients.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient Profile and Diagnostic Distribution in a Turkish Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic: A Prospective 2-Month Analysis.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Diagnosing a rheumatological disease in patients newly referred by their general practitioner requires assessment by a rheumatologist and often diagnostic tests. Ideally, these tests are performed prior to the patient's first consultation with the rheumatologist, aiming for quick diagnosis and fewer visits. We retrospectively studied whether a pre-first visit digital patient questionnaire can lead to fewer consultations and faster diagnosis. Methods: We applied machine learning-based binary classification algorithms to questionnaire data of newly referred patients to classify a patient's diagnostic class (inflammatory vs. non-inflammatory). Afterwards, we quantified the rheumatology clinic's benefit when all patients classified to be non-inflammatory are planned for specific diagnostic tests at their first visit. Results: Classification for inflammatory vs. non-inflammatory disease could be done with accuracy of 0.771, sensitivity (recall) of 0.809 and precision of 0.833. When non-inflammatory classified patients receive a blood test before first consultation, on average 0.1 in-person consultations and 0.26 teleconsultations per patient are avoided at the cost of having overdiagnostics for 44% of all newly referred patients. If, in addition to a blood test, the first consultation is also preceded by a radiology examination, on average 0.21 in-person consultations and 0.49 teleconsultations per patient are avoided, at the cost of having overdiagnostics (e.g. only the blood test or the combination of the blood test and radiology examination) for 71% of all newly referred patients. Conclusion: Classification algorithms based on pre-first visit patient questionnaires may shorten the patient journey in a rheumatology outpatient clinic and may therefore improve efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.