Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256626›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Epidemiologic evaluation of human papillomavirus type competition in unvaccinated women from Xiamen, China.

Yu Chen, Qing Li, Liya Du, Zhuowen Du, Yixi Zhou, Yanru Huang, Jian Zhang, Wenbo Wang, Lutan Zhang, Jieqiong Xie and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yu Chen *Department of Central Laboratory, Fujian Key Clinical Specialty of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Qing Li *Women's Health Care Department, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Liya Du *Department of Quality Control, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Zhuowen DuUnited Diagnostic and Research Center for Clinical Genetics, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yixi ZhouDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fujian Key Clinical Specialty of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yanru HuangDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fujian Key Clinical Specialty of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fujian Key Clinical Specialty of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Wenbo WangDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fujian Key Clinical Specialty of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Lutan ZhangDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fujian Key Clinical Specialty of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Jieqiong XieDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fujian Key Clinical Specialty of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Chao XuDepartment of Information Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yunsheng GeDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fujian Key Clinical Specialty of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Xingmei YaoDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fujian Key Clinical Specialty of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yulin ZhouDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fujian Key Clinical Specialty of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is expected to reduce the burden of cervical cancer and other HPV-related diseases. However, if competition exists among HPV types, type replacement may occur following the reduction of vaccine-targeted types. Here, we conducted the study to explore natural HPV type competition in unvaccinated women. Methods: HPV DNA test results from cervical samples collected between January 2013 and July 2023 at Xiamen University's Women and Children's Hospital were analyzed. In cross-sectional study, first-visit HPV genotyping results were used, and logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate interactions between vaccine-targeted and other HPV types. In cohort of women with multiple visits, the risk of acquiring other HPV types was compared between women infected with vaccine-targeted types and those HPV-negative using Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Among 159,049 women, 19.8% tested HPV-positive, with 5.1% having multiple types. Significant negative associations were observed between HPV-6 and HPV-72 (OR: < 0.01; 95%CI: < 0.01-0.03), HPV-18 and HPV-72 (OR: < 0.01; 95%CI: < 0.01-0.02), HPV-31 and HPV-83 (OR: < 0.01; 95%CI: < 0.01-0.55), HPV-33 and HPV-26 (OR: < 0.01; 95%CI: < 0.01-0.81), HPV-45 and HPV-55 (OR: < 0.01; 95%CI: < 0.01- < 0.01), HPV-56 and HPV-26 (OR: < 0.01; 95%CI: < 0.01-0.09), as well as HPV-59 and HPV-69 (OR: < 0.01; 95%CI: < 0.01-0.68), suggesting potential type competition. However, no type competition pair was found in the cohort study. Conversely, women with vaccine-targeted types had a higher risk of acquiring other types (HR > 1.0). Conclusions: Our findings suggested that HPV-6 and HPV-72, HPV-18 and HPV-72, HPV-31 and HPV-83, HPV-33 and HPV-26, HPV-45 and HPV-55, HPV-56 and HPV-26, HPV-59 and HPV-69 were potential type competition pairs.

Indexed as

cervical cancerHPV vaccinehuman papillomavirus (HPV)infectiontype competition

Identifiers

PMID40256626
PMCPMC12006131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.