ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Effects of different pollination methods on tomato fruits' quality and metabolism.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancements and prospects in key technologies for robotic pollination in greenhouse pepper breeding: a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bee pollination can affect tomato yield and quality. The mechanism of improving the yield and quality of tomatoes by bee pollination is not clear, and few studies have been conducted. To understand how bee pollination affects tomato quality, by using respectively weighing, vernier caliper, handheld refractometer, pH meter to measure single fruit weight, fruit size, the sugar content, and the pH value, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine endogenous hormone content, and LC-MS to perform untargeted metabolomics analysis, we compared these physiological indicators, endogenous hormone levels, and metabolism of tomato fruits pollinated after honeybee, bumblebee, and plan growth regulator (PGR) pollination. Our results indicate that the tomatoes pollinated by bumblebees were heavier and larger than those pollinated by honeybees and PGR. The sugar content of tomatoes pollinated by honeybees and bumblebees significantly respectively increased by 7.96% and 10.18% than that of tomatoes pollinated by PGR. The pH value of tomatoes pollinated by honeybees (3.99 ± 0.02) and bumblebees (3.94 ± 0.03) was significantly lower than that of tomatoes pollinated by PGR (4.19 ± 0.04) (p < 0.05). Different pollination methods significantly affected the content of endogenous hormones in fruits. In five endogenous hormones, the highest content was gibberellin (GA) in honeybee pollination treatment, IAA in bumblebee treatment, and the highest contents were abscisic acid (ABA), zeatin (ZT), and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.