Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256483›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2025

The diagnostic value of real-time ultrasound elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in BI-RADS 4A breast lesions.

Yindi Zhu, Li Jiang, Yue-Nan Chen, Mingyue Wang, Tina J Hieken, Mei-Fang Pan, Dian Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yindi Zhu *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Li Jiang *Department of Ultrasound, Suzhou Xiangcheng People's Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Yue-Nan ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Suzhou Xiangcheng People's Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Mingyue WangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Tina J HiekenDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mei-Fang PanDepartment of Ultrasound, Suzhou Xiangcheng People's Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Dian ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Suzhou Xiangcheng People's Hospital, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) is the primary system for classifying clinical breast lesions. Most early lesions identified via ultrasound are classified as BI-RADS 4A or lower. Although the vast majority of BI-RADS 4A lesions are benign, those lesions still have the possibility of malignancy in clinical practice, which is a controversial and noteworthy issue. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of real-time ultrasound elastography (UE) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in evaluating BI-RADS 4A breast lesions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of the UE and CEUS data of 52 BI-RADS 4A breast lesions from 52 patients between January 2020 and March 2023. All diagnoses were confirmed by surgical pathology. Lesion characteristics, including the margins, echogenicity, size, microcalcifications, blood flow patterns, UE scores, and CEUS features, were analyzed. CEUS scores were based on a five-point system, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using MedCalc version 19.0.4. Results: Based on the postoperative pathology, of the 52 lesions, 27 were benign and 25 were malignant. Compared to those with benign lesions, the patients with malignant lesions were older and had larger lesions (P<0.05). Features such as irregular morphology, indistinct margins, increased blood flow, and calcifications were more common in the malignant lesions than the benign lesions (P<0.05). The malignant lesions also had a higher prevalence of inhomogeneous enhancement, vasa vasorum, irregular enhanced morphology, and crab claw-like signs on CEUS than the benign lesions (P<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of both the UE and CEUS individually was 76.9%, while the diagnostic accuracy of the UE and CEUS combined reached 80.8%. The AUCs of UE, CEUS, and the UE and CEUS combined were 0.761, 0.773, and 0.813, respectively. Conclusions: UE and CEUS have significant diagnostic value for BI-RADS 4A breast lesions. Combining these techniques improves diagnostic accuracy and can help reduce unnecessary biopsies.

Indexed as

breast cancerBreast Imaging-Reporting and Data System 4A (BI-RADS 4A)contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)diagnosisReal-time ultrasound elastography

Identifiers

PMID40256483
PMCPMC12004297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.