ArticleGland surgery2025
Risk factor analysis and clinical experience of treating red breast syndrome in acellular dermal matrix and implant-based breast reconstruction.
Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complications associated with acellular dermal matrix use in implant-based breast reconstruction.Gland surgery · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Red breast syndrome (RBS) is represented as idiopathic cutaneous erythema overlying the acellular dermal matrix (ADM) after implant-based breast reconstruction without other signs and symptoms of infection. Although a number of etiologies including lymphatic disruption, delayed hypersensitivity reaction to ADM, and residual DNA within ADM have been suggested for RBS, consensus regarding risk factors and treatment for RBS has been reached yet. Thus, the aim of this study was to find risk factors for RBS and introduce our experience of successful treatment of RBS. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted for patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction using ADM from October 2018 to February 2021. Demographics, types of ADM used, reconstructive characteristics, and incidence of RBS were analyzed. Risk factors for RBS were investigated using the logistic regression model. Results: A total of 138 implant-based breast reconstructions using ADM were performed. Their average follow-up period was 17.33 months. The incidence of RBS was 5.8% (n=8) with a median onset time of 36 days. Based on the logistic regression analysis, prior history of radiotherapy [odds ratio (OR): 22.703, P=0.001] was the only significant risk factors for RBS. In most cases with RBS suspected (6 of 8), it was resolved with intravenous corticosteroid and 1 week course of oral antibiotics. Conclusions: Prior history of radiotherapy was found to be significant risk factor for RBS. Single dose IV corticosteroid with 1 week course of oral antibiotics might be useful for RBS treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.