ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Vitamin K Antagonists for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: An Update Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation patients with liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Trends in atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter and cirrhosis-related mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2020: a CDC WONDER analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Echocardiographic Guidance for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Systematic Review of Outcomes in High-Risk Populations Including Chronic Liver Disease and Prior Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and liver cirrhosis (LC). Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs comparing DOACs and VKAs in patients with AF and LC. Analyses were performed in R software. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR). Results: Eleven studies encompassing 19,617 patients were included, with 9379 receiving DOACs and 10,238 receiving VKAs. DOACs were associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of major bleeding (HR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.61-0.81; Conclusion: DOACs may be a feasible option for patients with AF and LC, demonstrating similar effectiveness to VKAs while exhibiting a better safety profile. These findings await validation by prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.