ArticlePulmonary circulation2025
A Prospective Analysis of Vasoreactivity and Mortality in WHO Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute pulmonary vasoreactivity: a simple test revisited in the contemporary era - a narrative review.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prognostic markers of Group 3 pulmonary hypertension (PH) remain largely unknown. In this study, we evaluate clinical data to provide a comprehensive profile of patients with Group 3 PH and evaluate the potential use of vasoreactivity testing as a prognostic tool within this population. We hypothesized that patients with a stronger vasoconstrictive component of their pulmonary vascular disease would have a more favorable prognosis. Patients were given inhaled nitric oxide during their right heart catheterization to determine if they met the European Respiratory Society guidelines for having a positive vasoreactivity test as defined for patients with Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). While vasoreactivity response is proven to predict survival in subgroups of PAH, there was no significant relationship between change in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) during acute vasodilator challenge and survival within our cohort. On the contrary, patients with larger decreases in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) during the acute vasodilator challenge were at a significantly higher risk of mortality. The data suggests that the change in PVR during acute vasodilator challenge may be a better indicator of survival in patients with WHO Group 3 PH than the change in mPAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.