Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256372›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hearing2024

Sensory Inhibition and Tinnitus: Measurement of Auditory Gating.

Kenneth Morse, Julia Campbell, Lauren Ralston

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hearing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kenneth MorseDivision of Communication Sciences and Disorders, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Julia CampbellCentral Sensory Processes Laboratory, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Lauren RalstonCentral Sensory Processes Laboratory, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tinnitus is the perception of sound without the presence of an external stimulus. The mechanisms associated with tinnitus are not entirely known, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. Although tinnitus mechanisms are not entirely known, there is evidence supporting an association between tinnitus with cochlear damage, reduced inhibition, and atypical cortical function. These mechanisms have been studied in animal models and people with tinnitus using a variety of different approaches. One approach that is a possible indicator of tinnitus in humans is sensory or auditory gating, which is a measure of inhibition. The goals of this article are to (1) review the mechanistic evidence associating tinnitus with cochlear damage and reduced inhibition, (2) discuss evidence of inhibitory impairments in people with tinnitus represented by auditory gating, and (3) address potential future directions to improve our ability to evaluate auditory gating mechanisms in people with tinnitus.

Indexed as

auditory gatinginhibitionsensory gatingtinnitus

Identifiers

PMID40256372
PMCPMC12007082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.