ReviewSeminars in hearing2024
Tinnitus Stepped-Care: A Model for Standardizing Clinical Services for Tinnitus.
Review in Seminars in hearing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical services for tinnitus have expanded greatly since the "masking" method was introduced by Jack Vernon in the 1970s. According to PubMed, the number of peer-reviewed publications has increased dramatically since that time (seven with "tinnitus" in the title in 1975; 477 in 2023). With so much research and overall interest, it might be expected that tinnitus services have improved accordingly. In reality, there are many variations of treatment, but no one method has been shown to be more effective than any other. This diversity of methods is evident when researching "tinnitus" on the internet and considering the many different ways clinicians offer tinnitus services. Some offer an evidence-based method but may not have the competency to ensure fidelity. Further is the proliferation of commercial methods that can cost thousands of dollars. In this article, I propose a framework for providing tinnitus clinical services called Tinnitus Stepped-Care. This framework does not promote specific procedures for tinnitus assessment and treatment, but rather suggests guiding principles that are essential in each of six progressive steps of tinnitus clinical care. It is further proposed to test the stepped-care model in the (currently under development) Tinnitus Learning Health Network (TLHN). The TLHN would consist of a network of clinicians, patients, and researchers from around the world who collaborate in establishing "best tinnitus practices." Collaboration would involve using and sharing data for the ongoing monitoring of a large, diverse, well-described patient population, and using quality improvement science to test and monitor outcomes over time, to determine the most effective treatments for different subgroups of tinnitus patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.