Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256366›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hearing2024

Tinnitus Stepped-Care: A Model for Standardizing Clinical Services for Tinnitus.

James A Henry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hearing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

James A HenryVA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical services for tinnitus have expanded greatly since the "masking" method was introduced by Jack Vernon in the 1970s. According to PubMed, the number of peer-reviewed publications has increased dramatically since that time (seven with "tinnitus" in the title in 1975; 477 in 2023). With so much research and overall interest, it might be expected that tinnitus services have improved accordingly. In reality, there are many variations of treatment, but no one method has been shown to be more effective than any other. This diversity of methods is evident when researching "tinnitus" on the internet and considering the many different ways clinicians offer tinnitus services. Some offer an evidence-based method but may not have the competency to ensure fidelity. Further is the proliferation of commercial methods that can cost thousands of dollars. In this article, I propose a framework for providing tinnitus clinical services called Tinnitus Stepped-Care. This framework does not promote specific procedures for tinnitus assessment and treatment, but rather suggests guiding principles that are essential in each of six progressive steps of tinnitus clinical care. It is further proposed to test the stepped-care model in the (currently under development) Tinnitus Learning Health Network (TLHN). The TLHN would consist of a network of clinicians, patients, and researchers from around the world who collaborate in establishing "best tinnitus practices." Collaboration would involve using and sharing data for the ongoing monitoring of a large, diverse, well-described patient population, and using quality improvement science to test and monitor outcomes over time, to determine the most effective treatments for different subgroups of tinnitus patients.

Indexed as

assessmentinterventionstandardizationtinnitustreatment

Identifiers

PMID40256366
PMCPMC12007088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.