ArticlePeer community journal2025
Detection of domestication signals through the analysis of the full distribution of fitness effects.
Article in Peer community journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population Genetic Study ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Evolutionary consequences of domestication on the selective effects of new amino acid changing mutations in canids.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Domestication is a process marked by complex interactions between demographic changes and selective pressures, which together shape genetic diversity. While the phenotypic outcomes of domestication are well documented, its genetic basis-particularly the dynamics of selection-remain less well understood. To investigate these dynamics, we performed simulations designed to approximate the demographic history of large domestic mammals. These simulations used selection coefficients as a modeling tool to represent changes in selection pressures, recognizing that such coefficients are abstractions rather than direct representations of biological reality. Specifically, we analyzed site frequency spectra (SFS) under varying distributions of fitness effects (DFE) and proportions of mutations with divergent selective pressures. Our results show that the discretized deleterious DFE can be reliably inferred from the SFS of a single population, but reconstructing the beneficial DFE and demographic history remains challenging, even when using the joint SFS of both populations. We further developed a novel joint DFE inference model to estimate the proportion of mutations with divergent selection coefficients (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.