ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma in a Public Health Service in Brazil.
Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The authors sought to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence, tumor thickness, and time between diagnosis and first treatment of cutaneous melanoma patients. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted based on the analysis of electronic medical records of patients treated at a reference service in Cutaneous Oncology within the scope of the Unified Health System in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. The population was evaluated according to the date of diagnosis and was classified into three periods: 1) pre-pandemic period (January 2019 to March 2020), 2) pandemic period 1 (April 2020 to June 2021), and 3) pandemic period 2 (July 2021 to September 2022). Sociodemographic characteristics of the study population, tumor characteristics, and the time interval between diagnosis and first treatment were evaluated. Results: Seventy-six patients were evaluated, 25 (32.89%) diagnosed in the pre-pandemic period, 22 (28.94%) in pandemic period 1, and 29 (38.15%) in pandemic period 2. No significant differences were observed between the sociodemographic characteristics of the population, tumor thickness, and the presence of ulceration in the three periods analyzed. There was also no delay between diagnosis and the first treatment during the pandemic. Limitations: The size of the population, and the use of retrospective data extracted from medical records, without a systematized record of information. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic did not impact the incidence, thickness of melanomas, or the time between diagnosis and first treatment. This study demonstrated the importance of adapting the routine of health services and adapting the flow of oncology care in times of health crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40256343PMC12007661What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.