ArticleOphthalmology science
Deep Learning-Driven Glaucoma Medication Bottle Recognition: A Multilingual Clinical Validation Study in Patients with Impaired Vision.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To clinically validate a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based Android smartphone app in the identification of topical glaucoma medications for patients with glaucoma and impaired vision. Design: Nonrandomized prospective crossover study. Participants: The study population included a total of 20 non-English-speaking (11 Spanish and 9 Vietnamese) and 21 English-speaking patients who presented to an academic glaucoma clinic from December 2023 through September 2024. Patients with poor vision were selected on the basis of visual acuity (VA) of 20/70 or worse in 1 eye as per the California Department of Motor Vehicles' driver's license screening standard. Intervention: Enrolled subjects participated in a medication identification activity in which they identified a set of 6 topical glaucoma medications presented in a randomized order. Subjects first identified half of the medications without the CNN-based app. They then identified the remaining half of the medications with the app. Responses to a standardized ease-of-use survey were collected before and after using the app. Main Outcome Measures: Primary quantitative outcomes from the medication identification activity were accuracy and time. Primary qualitative outcomes from the ease-of-use survey were subjective ratings of ease of smartphone app use. Results: The CNN-based mobile app achieved a mean average precision of 98.8% and recall of 97.2%. Identification accuracy significantly improved from 27.6% without the app to 99.2% with the app across all participants, with no significant change in identification time. This observed improvement in accuracy was similar among non-English-speaking (71.6%) and English-speaking (71.4%) participants. The odds ratio (OR) for identification accuracy with the app was 319.353 ( Conclusions: The CNN-based mobile app significantly improves medication identification accuracy in patients with glaucomatous vision loss without increasing the time to identification. This tool has the potential to enhance adherence in both English- and non-English-speaking populations and offers a practical adjunct to daily medication management for patients with glaucoma and low VA. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.