Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256301›Full record

ArticleCurrent urology2024

Two novel deep-learning models to predict spontaneous ureteral calculi passage: Model development and validation.

Zhiying Xiao, Hui Bai, Yumeng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhiying XiaoDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Hui BaiDepartment of Medical Radiology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yumeng ZhangDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate two deep-learning (DL) models for predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP). Materials and methods: A total of 1217 patients with thin-layer computed tomography-confirmed ureteral stones in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2022 were retrospectively examined. These patients were grouped into 3 data sets: the training set (n = 1000), the validation set ( Results: Of the 1217 patients, SSP was reported in 446 (36.6%). The total accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 76.9%, 56.1%, and 90.8% for the stone diameter approach; 87.1%, 84.2%, and 92.7% for the 2D ResNet29 model; and 90.6%, 88.2%, and 95.1% for the 3D ResNet29 model, respectively. Both the 2D and 3D ResNet29 models showed significantly higher accuracy than the stone diameter approach. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that both DL models had a significantly higher area under the curve than the stone diameter-based classification. Conclusions: The DL models, particularly the 3D model, are novel and effective methods for predicting SSP rates. Using such models may help determine whether a patient should receive surgical intervention or expect a long interval before stone passage.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networkComputed tomographyDeep learningPrediction modelSpontaneous passageUreteral stone

Identifiers

PMID40256301
PMCPMC12004963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.