ArticleCurrent urology2024
Relevance of Guy's stone score in evaluation and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Article in Current urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive value of scoring systems for stone free status and complications before percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to ascertain the relevance of the Guy's stone score in the evaluation and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and methods: This 2-year hospital-based, prospective clinical study enrolled 100 patients who were indicated for PCNL. All patients were allocated into groups according to the Guy's stone score and were compared for factors associated with stone-free rate (SFR) and complication risk. The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 20. Results: The median patient age was 40 years (range, 5-70 years). A greater portion of the patients were aged 31-40 years. A majority of the stones were solitary, found in 83% of the kidneys. Overall, 49% were grouped as Guy's stone score 1, 26% as 2, 11% as 3, and 14% as 4. The overall SFR was 97%. Furthermore, SFR was found to be 100% for Guy's stone score 1, 100% for 2, 90.91% for 3, and 85.7% for 4. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were found in 6% and 38% of the patients, respectively. Among postoperative complications, pain (26%) was the most frequent, followed by fever (8%), bleeding (3%), and puncture site abscess (1%). Conclusions: Based on the study findings, Guy's stone score was efficient in predicting PCNL outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.