ArticleCurrent urology2024
The efficacy and safety of ureteroscopic lithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy with continuous anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs: A multicenter retrospective real-world study.
Article in Current urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of ureteroscopic lithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for treating patients on anticoagulant (AC) or antiplatelet (AP) medications. Patients and Methods: The study included 213 patients with urinary stones who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy or fURS between January 2019 and October 2022 at the Shanghai Municipal Hospital Urology Specialist Alliance. Among these patients, 15 received AC therapy, 193 received AP therapy, and 5 received both AC and AP therapy. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the real-world management of antithrombotic drugs: the continuation group (n = 62), the discontinuation group (n = 91), and the discontinuation and bridge heparin group (n = 60). Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared among the 3 groups. Results: Age, sex, body mass index, stone location, stone size, stone side, and residual fragments were not different among the groups. None of the patients received blood transfusions or had thromboembolic events, emergencies for gross hematuria, significant bleeding-related complications, or unplanned secondary ureteroscopic surgery. The mean duration of hospital stay of the continuation group (3.97 days) was significantly lower than that of the discontinuation group (5.99 days) and the discontinuation and bridge heparin group (5.75 days) ( Conclusions: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy and fURS can be performed safely and effectively in patients on AC or AP drugs, resulting in reduced duration of hospital stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.