ArticleHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2025
Qualitative insights into ecobiosocial factors influencing colorectal cancer risk in Malaysia.
Article in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a growing public health concern in Malaysia influenced by a complex interplay of ecological, biological, and social (EBS) factors. Despite its increasing incidence, limited research has explored how these factors interact to shape CRC risk in the Malaysian context, especially from the perspectives of affected individuals. This study explores Malaysians' perceptions and experiences regarding CRC risk within the EBS framework. Methods: A qualitative case study approach involved in-depth interviews with twelve Malaysians aged 35-75 who had undergone colonoscopy at a university hospital. All interviews were recorded and transcribed. Data were collected until saturation was achieved. The transcripts were coded and analysed using ATLAS.ti software. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Findings revealed key themes related to ecological factors in the physical activity environment, which included the sub-themes of type, facilitators, barriers to physical activity, and food sources. The biological factors theme revealed that a family history of CRC influences experience and perception. The subthemes of social factors were sociocultural customs, misconceptions, food preparation methods, CRC-related foods, and food affordability. Conclusion: The findings highlighted the multifactorial nature of CRC risk. Understanding the aspects of EBS supports the development of targeted public health interventions to address modifiable CRC risk factors and promote prevention and early CRC detection in the Malaysian context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.