ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2025
Identifying Features of Resilience to Childhood Maltreatment in Resting-State Connectivity Data From Adults With and Without a History of Mood Disorder.
Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Childhood maltreatment (CM) is associated with negative mental health outcomes. Many studies conceptualize resilience as experiencing CM without developing psychopathology (primary resilience). However, some people may develop subsequent psychopathology but recover and demonstrate higher global functioning (secondary resilience). This study investigated the role of salience and emotion network (SEN) (including the amygdala, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, and anterior insula) and cognitive control network (CCN) (including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal lobule, and thalamus) connectivity in primary and secondary resilience. Methods: We examined resting-state functional connectivity in 108 nonclinical control participants and 154 individuals with any mood disorder (AMD). We measured functioning and CM using the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), respectively. For primary resilience, we conducted whole-brain analyses of SEN and CCN regions to test for group × CTQ interactions. For secondary resilience, within-AMD group analyses tested for CTQ × GAF interactions. Results: Group × CTQ interactions revealed that control participants with higher levels of CM showed greater within-SEN and within-CCN connectivity than participants in the AMD group. In the AMD group, participants with higher levels of CM and functioning (secondary resilience) showed greater within-CCN connectivity while participants with higher levels of CM and lower functioning showed greater within-SEN connectivity. Conclusions: Greater SEN connectivity appears to play a key role in primary resilience, as observed in the control group, but only within the context of greater CCN connectivity. Future work should explore which cognitive control features are most beneficial and whether targeted interventions help foster resilience to recurrent psychopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.