ArticleJournal of medical physics
Evaluation of Low-dose Computed Tomography Images Reconstructed Using Artificial Intelligence-based Adaptive Filtering for Denoising: A Comparison with Computed Tomography Reconstructed with Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a radiomics and clinical feature-based nomogram for preoperative prediction of pathological grade in bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Awareness of radiation-induced risk led to the development of various dose optimization techniques in iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms and deep learning algorithms to improve low-dose image quality. PixelShine (PS) by AlgoMedica Inc., USA, is a vendor-neutral deep learning denoising tool for low-dose studies, and this study analyzed its images. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of PS-reconstructed images obtained at various low doses (LDs). Materials and Methods: A retrospective study qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated the low-dose PS-reconstructed images by comparing them with other reconstruction methods and standard dose (SD) images. A total of 85 cases were evaluated, of which 32 cases were scanned on a scanner with filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction with LD scans performed at 70%-50% of SD. The remaining 53 cases were performed on the scanner with IR, 35 of them had LD scan at 50% of SD and 18 cases had LD scan at 33% of SD. Results: Qualitative image analysis - The quality of low-dose images with PS and IR was almost equivalent in terms of noise magnitude and texture at 50% dose, and PS images were slightly better at 33% dose reduction. Quantitative image analysis - Low-dose PS-reconstructed images and low-dose iterative reconstructed images had similar contrast-to-noise ratio at 50% dose reduction; however, at 33% of the SD, PS-reconstructed images outperformed. The SD FBP images were equivalent to LD PS-reconstructed images (50% dose reduction). Conclusions: Artificial intelligence-based denoising algorithms produce similar images as IR at 50% dose reduction and outperform it at 33% of the SD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.