ArticleJournal of medical physics
Detection of Alzheimer's Disease using Explainable Machine Learning and Mathematical Models.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Detection of brain network abnormalities by graph invariants in Alzheimer's disease using MRI images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study proposes a novel approach combining mathematical modeling and machine learning (ML) to classify four Alzheimer's disease (AD) stages from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Methodology: We first mapped each MRI pixel value matrix to a 2 × 2 matrix, using the techniques of forming a moment of inertia (MI) tensor, commonly used in physics to measure the mass distribution. Using the properties of the obtained inertia tensor and their eigenvalues, along with ML techniques, we classify the different stages of AD. Results: In this study, we have compared the performance of an intuitive mathematical model integrated with a machine learning approach across various ML models. Among them, the Gaussian Naïve Bayes classifier achieves the highest accuracy of 95.45%. Conclusions: Beyond improved accuracy, our method offers potential for computational efficiency due to dimensionality reduction and provides novel physical insights into AD through inertia tensor analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.