Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256163›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Transcranial focused ultrasound targeting the default mode network for the treatment of depression.

Jessica N Schachtner, Jacob F Dahill-Fuchel, Katja E Allen, Christopher R Bawiec, Peter J Hollender, Sarah B Ornellas, Soren D Konecky, Achal S Achrol, John J B Allen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06320028 (Altering Default Mode Network Activity to Reduce Depressive Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06320028 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Altering Default Mode Network Activity to Reduce Depressive Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArizonaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsDepressive Disorder, Major, DepressionArmsNon-Invasive Transcranial Focused Ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessica N SchachtnerPsychology Department, Psychophysiology Lab, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Jacob F Dahill-FuchelPsychology Department, Psychophysiology Lab, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Katja E AllenPsychology Department, Psychophysiology Lab, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Christopher R BawiecOpenwater, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Peter J HollenderOpenwater, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Sarah B OrnellasOpenwater, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Soren D KoneckyOpenwater, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Achal S AchrolOpenwater, San Francisco, CA, United States.
John J B AllenPsychology Department, Psychophysiology Lab, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Up to 50% of individuals fail to respond to current depression treatments. Repetitive negative thought and default mode network hyperconnectivity are central in depression and can potentially be targeted using novel neuromodulation techniques. This community-based study assessed whether a treatment using non-invasive transcranial focused ultrasound targeting the default mode network can decrease depression symptoms and repetitive negative thought, and improve quality of life. Methods: Study recruitment began in August 2023 and ended in February 2024. Twenty individuals aged 18 - 50 were enrolled from among 247 screened. Exclusion criteria included history of psychosis/mania, acute suicidality, MRI contraindications, pregnancy, and medical and neurological factors that may complicate diagnosis or brain function. Participants completed up to three weeks of transcranial ultrasound (11 sessions) targeting the anterior medial prefrontal cortex; ten minutes per session. Depression severity (Beck Depression Inventory - II and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale), repetitive negative thought (Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire), and quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale) were outcomes. Results: This sample was young (mean 30.4 years ± 10.0), predominantly female (75%), with moderate to severe depression and high comorbidity. Fifty percent of participants endorsed current psychiatric medication use. Ten percent of subjects dropped out of the study due to time constraints. Significant decreases in depression were observed over the course of treatment on self-report, 10.9 (p < 0.001, CI = -13.55, -7.92) and interview depression ratings, 4.2 (p < 0.001, CI = -5.85, -2.62), as well as significant decreases in repetitive negative thought, 8.4 (p <0.001, CI = -10.55, -6.03). Improvements in physical and psychological well-being were also observed over the course of treatment, 7.2 (p < 0.001, CI = 3.64, 10.63) and 11.2 (p < 0.001, CI = 7.79, 14.49), respectively, as well as improvements in environment satisfaction, 5.0 (p =0.001, CI = 2.24, 7.56). Discussion: Non-invasive transcranial focused ultrasound holds promise as a treatment for depression holds promise as a treatment for depression, however, future work including control arms is required to ascertain its causal role in depression. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06320028intr=Ultrasound&cond=depression&locStr=Arizona&country=United%20States&state=Arizona&rank=1, identifier NCT06320028.

Indexed as

default mode networkdepressionmood disorderrepetitive negative thinking (RNT)transcranial ultrasonic neuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID40256163
PMCPMC12006932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.