ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Aortic dissection type A, common carotid artery occlusion, and stroke after dapsone for 20 years.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of primary care physicians in monitoring drug-related problems: A mandate.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term use of dapsone, a sulfone with anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties, has not been previously reported in association with aortic dissection type A. The patient is a 61-year-old male who suffered an acute type-A aortic dissection at rest at the age of 56. Due to the involvement of the right common carotid artery in the dissection, he also suffered an ischemic stroke with left hemiparesis. His past medical history was positive for continuous use of dapsone (100 mg/d) for 20 years for a bullous, pruritic eczema. Besides dapsone, smoking was the only risk factor for aortic dissection. He underwent aortic valve and aortic replacement and achieved a modified Ranking score of 2 after administration of phenprocumon, bisoprolol, atorvastatin, and sertraline and intensive rehabilitation. Since quinolones are associated with aortic dissection, it was assumed that dapsone was also involved in the pathophysiology of aortic dissection. This case demonstrates that long-term use of dapsone may contribute to vascular pathology that ultimately leads to aortic dissection. Unless necessary, dapsone should not be given for years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.