Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256061›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Knowledge of married Saudi women about emergency contraception: A cross-sectional study.

Yazeed Albalawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yazeed AlbalawiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emergency contraception (EC) are methods of birth control that females may use to prevent pregnancy for up to 5 days after unprotected intercourse. This study aims to assess the knowledge of Saudi married women about EC and find its associated factors. Methodology: This cross-sectional analytical study included married Saudi women. The data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. We used the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 for data management and statistical analysis. Results: The study included 437 women whose average age ± SD was 35 ± 7 years. Homemakers constituted 54% of the respondents. Of all, 41.2% reported that they used EC before and 28.6% acquired their EC knowledge from doctors and pharmacists. The score ranged from 0 to 100, with an average of 26.7 ± 25.3. Younger women showed higher average knowledge scores. Similarly, having more offspring was negatively correlated with EC knowledge. Higher levels of education demonstrated higher average knowledge scores as postgraduates had a higher average than other groups. Women who are employed, had higher monthly family income, had doctors and pharmacists as source of their EC knowledge, previously used EC and recently visited their physician for family planning all demonstrated significantly higher knowledge scores. Conclusion: According to the results of our study, Saudi married women have a range of low to high knowledge of EC. We advise placing an emphasis on EC during counselling sessions for family planning as well as running educational programmes for women who are of reproductive age.

Indexed as

Emergency contraceptionknowledgemarried womenSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID40256061
PMCPMC12007800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.