ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Knowledge of married Saudi women about emergency contraception: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emergency contraception (EC) are methods of birth control that females may use to prevent pregnancy for up to 5 days after unprotected intercourse. This study aims to assess the knowledge of Saudi married women about EC and find its associated factors. Methodology: This cross-sectional analytical study included married Saudi women. The data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. We used the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 for data management and statistical analysis. Results: The study included 437 women whose average age ± SD was 35 ± 7 years. Homemakers constituted 54% of the respondents. Of all, 41.2% reported that they used EC before and 28.6% acquired their EC knowledge from doctors and pharmacists. The score ranged from 0 to 100, with an average of 26.7 ± 25.3. Younger women showed higher average knowledge scores. Similarly, having more offspring was negatively correlated with EC knowledge. Higher levels of education demonstrated higher average knowledge scores as postgraduates had a higher average than other groups. Women who are employed, had higher monthly family income, had doctors and pharmacists as source of their EC knowledge, previously used EC and recently visited their physician for family planning all demonstrated significantly higher knowledge scores. Conclusion: According to the results of our study, Saudi married women have a range of low to high knowledge of EC. We advise placing an emphasis on EC during counselling sessions for family planning as well as running educational programmes for women who are of reproductive age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.