ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Cognitive skills assessment in deaf and hard of hearing school children.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond auditory limitations: Methodological considerations for cognitive Assessment in deaf and Hard-of-hearing children.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Globally, 466 million (5%) are having hearing disability of which 34 million are children. In India, 63 million people (6.3%) suffer from significant auditory loss. Cognitive abilities in deaf children have been assessed in the past and have shown incongruous results, with some finding that IQ (intelligence quotient) is same in the deaf population and the normal population and some have shown IQ to be less in deaf population. There are however hardly few Indian studies done in this context. Hence, the current study was aimed to assess cognitive skills in deaf and hard of hearing school children using Bhatia's Battery of Performance Test. Methodology: It was a cross-sectional comparative study; 52 deaf and hard of hearing children and 52 normal children of same age group without hearing or speech impairment from 5 Results: The mean age of the study population was 12.9 ± 1.12 years, whereas controls were 12.86 ± 1.20. There were 26 boys and 24 girls in each group. Scores of the tests were statistically ( Conclusion: The results show that deaf and hard of hearing children have an IQ almost similar in fact statistically better than their normal counterpart; this could help the families of these children to move out of the shadow of stigma associated with the disability and provide an opportunity to be trained like their normal counterparts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.