Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256049›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025

Traumatic spinal cord injury: a review of the current state of art and future directions - what do we know and where are we going?

Emmanuel O Mensah, Joshua I Chalif, Benjamin R Johnston, Eric Chalif, Tariq Parker, Saef Izzy, Zhigang He, Rajiv Saigal, Michael G Fehlings, Yi Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Purinergic Receptor P2Y2 Regulates Neurogenesis and Functional Recovery Following Spinal Cord Injury in Zebrafish.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emmanuel O MensahDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Joshua I ChalifDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Benjamin R JohnstonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Eric ChalifDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Tariq ParkerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Saef IzzyDivisions of Stroke, Cerebrovascular, and Critical Care Neurology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Zhigang HeF.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Rajiv SaigalDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Michael G FehlingsDivision of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yi LuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) remains a devastating condition, with limited functional recovery despite advancements in clinical management and understanding of its mechanisms. SCI pathophysiology involves primary mechanical trauma and secondary neuroimmune and structural changes, leading to neuronal death and chronic functional deficits. Methods: Through a comprehensive literature review of articles published in the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Reviews Library databases, this article provides an update on the current management of traumatic SCI with a focus on these emerging therapeutic strategies that hold potential for future advancements in the field. Results: Current management strategies include pre-hospital care, acute clinical interventions, surgical decompression and spine destabilization, and neurorehabilitation. Despite these interventions, SCI patients often fail to fully restore lost functions. Emerging therapies focus on neuroprotection, neuroregeneration, and neuromodulation, leveraging advances in molecular biomarkers, imaging techniques, and cell-based treatments. Neuroprotective agents, including the sodium-glutamate antagonist riluzole, aim to keep cells alive through the secondary injury phase, while regenerative strategies utilize neurotrophic factors and stem cell transplantation or approaches to target inhibitor molecules such as NOGO or RGMa to regenerate new cells, axons, and neural circuits. Neuromodulation techniques, such as electrical and magnetic field stimulation, offer promising avenues for functional recovery. Combining these novel therapies with traditional neurorehabilitation holds potential for improved outcomes. Conclusions: While significant strides have been made in understanding the mechanisms underlying SCI and in developing novel therapeutic approaches, the challenge and opportunity will be to tailor treatments to fit the heterogenous clinical presentation of patients with SCI and to better understand the heterogeneity in clinical trajectories.

Indexed as

NeuromodulationNeuroprotectionNeuroregenerationNeurorehabilitationTraumatic spinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID40256049
PMCPMC12008600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.