ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Sustained Impact of Task-shifting HCV Treatment to Nonspecialist Providers: 5-Year Follow Up of the ASCEND Investigation.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in Participants with Chronic HCV Infection and Comorbidities or Multiple Concomitant Medications: An Integrated Analysis.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has ushered in an era of short-duration treatment with high effectiveness across varied patient populations. In the ASCEND investigation, treatment with DAA was efficacious when delivered by nonspecialist and specialist providers. However, long-term outcomes after initial treatment are unknown. Objective: To determine the long-term outcomes after DAA treatment independently provided by nurse practitioners, primary care physicians, or specialist physicians using DAA therapy. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Twelve urban, federally qualified health centers in the District of Columbia. Participants: A total of 551 patients treated for HCV in the ASCEND investigation (A Phase IV Pilot Study to Assess of Community-based Treatment Efficacy in Chronic Hepatitis C Monoinfection and Coinfection with HIV in the District of Columbia). Interventions: None. Measurements: Sustained viral response (SVR12), reinfection, retreatment, death. Results: In this large sample of majority Black individuals receiving care at community-based centers, there was an initial 87% rate of SVR, and after 5 years of follow up, an additional 6.5% of participants were found to be cured. This included individuals originally lost to follow up whose subsequent testing confirmed SVR12, and those with successful retreatment after initial treatment failure. There was a 70% rate of testing for reinfection, with 2 identified reinfections. Treatment outcomes were not associated with original treating provider type. Limitations: As a retrospective analysis, these findings are limited by the availability of data in the electronic medical record. Conclusions: DAA is an effective treatment for HCV and can safely be prescribed by multiple provider types, with favorable long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.