ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2025
Comparison of visual acuity and optical quality between higher-order aspheric monofocal and standard introcular lenses.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of visual outcomes of enhanced monofocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Tolerance of residual myopic refractive errors in eyes with enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses with higher-order aspheric optics.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Outcomes on pseudophakic mini-monovision with monofocal intraocular lens on intermediate vision with immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Contrast Sensitivity After Combined MIGS and Cataract Surgery: A Comparison of Monofocal and Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Intermediate Visual Performance of Clareon Versus Eyhance Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Photopic and Mesopic Visual Performance of Enhanced Monofocal Versus Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Cataract Surgery with Implantation of Either a Partial-Depth of Field Extended or Monofocal Intraocular Lens.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Various Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Using a Novel Composite Method for the Analysis and Reporting of Uncorrected Distance, Intermediate, and Near Visual Acuities.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Comment on "Comparison of visual acuity and optical quality between higher-order aspheric monofocal and standard intraocular lenses".International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare the 12-month outcomes of visual performance and patient satisfaction of a higher-order aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a conventional monofocal IOL.
methodsProspective, randomized, comparative, double-blinded study including 22 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of the Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 IOL in one eye (ICB00 group) and the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL in the fellow eye (ZCB00 group). Uncorrected distance (UDVA), corrected distance (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate (UIVA), distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA), uncorrected near (UNVA), and distance-corrected near visual acuities (DCNVA) were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up. Contrast sensitivity, defocus curves, and reading text size were also evaluated. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire at the 6-month postoperative visit.
resultsMean postoperative logMAR UDVA was 0.01±0.12 and -0.02±0.10 in ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively (
conclusionThe eyes of patients implanted with the enhanced monofocal IOL evaluated have significantly better visual acuity for intermediate distances with the same contrast sensitivity as a conventional monofocal IOL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.