Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40256026›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2025

Bibliometric and visual analysis of scleral contact lenses: global characteristics and research trends from 1976 to 2023.

Jing Gao, Yao Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jing GaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yao XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo gain insight into the future research directions in scleral contact lenses (SCLs) through a comprehensive bibliometrics study.

methodsThe publications related to SCLs were screened from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database. All bibliographic information was extracted and used to conduct a performance analysis. CiteSpace and VOSviewer were employed to visualize annual publication counts, journals, authors, countries, institutions, collaboration networks, keywords, and references.

resultsA total of 498 articles were included in our analysis and the number of publications about SCLs showed a significant yearly increase. These publications predominantly emanated from 523 institutions across 38 countries, with the United States and Australia leading in frequency. Totally 1361 authors were identified, among whom Vincent J. Stephen exhibited the highest number of publications, while Jacobs S. Deborah received the most citations. Notably, the journal

conclusionAlthough SCLs have demonstrated significant potential in ophthalmological care, the results offer valuable insights pertinent to future research directions and clinical practice. Greater emphasis should be placed on developing enhancements in design, materials, and fitting technique, as well as on reducing the complications associated with SCLs.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysisscleral contact lensesvisual analysis

Identifiers

PMID40256026
PMCPMC11947534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.