SynthesisNagoya journal of medical science2025
The risk factors for development or progression of locomotive syndrome: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Locomotive Syndrome and N-Terminal Pro B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Concentration in a Health Screening Cohort: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Mediating Effect of Depression on Relationship Between Sleep Disturbance and Locomotive Syndrome in Geriatric Cancer Patients.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Correlation between musculoskeletal system function and pre-depressive states in elderly cancer patients: A single-center cross-sectional study.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Locomotive syndrome is a decline in mobility and is believed to occur before the occurrence of frailty and sarcopenia; therefore, early detection of risk factors is important. However, systematic reviews have not been conducted. A systematic review of observational studies was performed to identify risk factors for the development or progression of locomotive syndrome. We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Ichushi Web (in Japanese), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Studies that used the development or progression of locomotive syndrome as an outcome and were written in English or Japanese were included. However, studies with nonadult participants and review articles were excluded. The quality of the eligible studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias instrument. This study included 79 observational studies (8 cohort and 71 cross-sectional studies). A meta-analysis was not performed. All studies were conducted in Japan. The eight cohort studies included 2,343 participants aged 57.0-79.3 years upon study initiation. The risk factors for developing locomotive syndrome were objectively assessed by parameters of motor function and muscle strength, such as short one-leg standing time and weak grip strength. The progression of locomotive syndrome was associated with the preoperative risk stage of locomotive syndrome and postoperative surgical failure syndrome. Locomotive syndrome can be detected through the regular assessment of motor function and muscle strength. To prevent locomotive syndrome in middle-aged and older people, an examination by an expert is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.