ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2025
Efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients aged ≥80 years: a retrospective study.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Individualized dynamic ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation based on ibutilide response.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Catheter ablation is the first-line treatment for atrial fibrillation. Although the efficacy and safety of this procedure have been reported in older patients, they might diminish with age. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the safety and effectiveness of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients aged ≥80 years. We retrospectively analyzed the features of the catheter ablation and the subsequent clinical course and outcomes of 100 patients with atrial fibrillation aged ≥80 years who underwent ablation between July 2019 and December 2021 at Tosei General Hospital, Seto, Aichi, Japan. The average duration of atrial fibrillation was 6.0 ± 9.5 months, and 83% of the patients were symptomatic. Approximately 30% of patients developed heart failure, with 15% requiring hospitalization within one year before ablation. After ablation, 93% of patients were atrial fibrillation-free, and none required postoperative hospitalization due to heart failure. However, several complications have been observed, including cardiac tamponade, hematoma at the access site, and postoperative bradycardia. Notably, an enlarged left atrial diameter before ablation is a predictor of complications. In patients aged ≥80 years, atrial fibrillation ablation therapy demonstrated a high non-recurrence rate and may alter the progression of heart failure. Although the incidence of complications was relatively low, caution should be exercised when older patients with enlarged left atrial diameters undergo atrial fibrillation ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.