Trial reportNagoya journal of medical science2025
Prevention of central venous catheter occlusion by saline with or without heparin in intensive care unit after surgical intervention: a double-blind, randomized trial.
Trial report in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heparinized saline is used to prevent catheter obstruction; however, it is associated with concerns regarding the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and the accuracy of the blood test results. This study compared the impact of saline with and without heparin on central venous catheter occlusion rates in post-surgical intensive care unit patients using a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled design. Patients aged 20-90 years planned to experience central venous catheter insertion and postoperative intensive care unit admission were enrolled and were randomly assigned to either the heparin group (administered normal saline with heparin) or the control group (administered normal saline alone), based on a 1:1 ratio. Nurses blinded to patient allocation performed the occlusion assessment (every 24 h). The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess the time to occlusion or removal of each catheter. Central venous catheter insertion results of 136 patients showed no significant variation in occlusion rates between the heparin and control groups within the first 3 days. There was no significant difference between normal saline with and without heparin in preventing central venous occlusion in the intensive care unit up to 3 days post-surgery. The results of this study suggest that it is not necessary to use normal saline with heparin in the management of central venous catheter occlusion, at least when moving from the operating room to the intensive care unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.