Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255967›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025

The Evolution of Aesthetic Medicine: Exploring the Intersection of Social Psychology, Technology, and Aesthetic Medicine.

Steven Dayan, Berno Bucker, Jacques van der Meulen, John St John Blythe, Patricia Ogilvie, Damon Caiazza, Maria Musumeci, Michael Silberberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Steven Dayan
Berno Bucker
Jacques van der Meulen
John St John Blythe
Patricia Ogilvie
Damon Caiazza
Maria Musumeci
Michael Silberberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wealth of information can be garnered from the face, such as current emotional state, perceived overall health, personality traits, and even attributed capabilities. It is well understood within aesthetic medicine that minimally invasive treatments positively influence how a patient feels about themselves from an emotional and physical standpoint; however, a growing body of literature suggests that facial aesthetic treatments can also impact how an individual is perceived by others. First impressions, which are formed within milliseconds of viewing a new face, allow us to intuit information about the person and anticipate their intentions. Multiple theories aim to explain why and how these initial social impressions are formed from relatively simple visual cues, and increasing evidence suggests that augmentation of facial appearance influences how others form first impressions. In this article, we discuss theories underlying the importance of first impressions and how minimally invasive aesthetic treatments can affect first impressions and social attributions. We also discuss how advancements in technology can enhance consultations and how technology may expand the world of aesthetic medicine to patients who had not previously considered engaging with aesthetic treatments. Level of Evidence 5 Diagnostic:

Identifiers

PMID40255967
PMCPMC12007449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.