Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255938›Full record

ArticlePlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Plants' Contributions to People Shift With Glacier Extinction.

N Khelidj, S Balestra, M S Caccianiga, B E L Cerabolini, D Tampucci, G Losapio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

N KhelidjInstitute of Earth Surface Dynamics, Faculty of Geosciences and Environment University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3232-8923
S BalestraDepartment of Biosciences University of Milan Milan Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6264-8940
M S CaccianigaDepartment of Biosciences University of Milan Milan Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9715-1830
B E L CeraboliniDepartment of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences University of Insubria Varese Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3793-0733
D TampucciDepartment of Biosciences University of Milan Milan Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4804-1456
G LosapioInstitute of Earth Surface Dynamics, Faculty of Geosciences and Environment University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7589-8706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alpine environments are among the most vulnerable ecosystems to climate change, with glacier retreat rapidly altering plant communities, biodiversity, and ecosystem functions. However, the socio-economic consequences of these biodiversity changes remain largely unexplored. Understanding Nature's Contributions to People (NCP) provides a valuable framework for assessing biodiversity's role in human well-being. While NCP has typically been studied at the landscape level, we focus on species-specific contributions of plants to highlight the importance of glacial biodiversity for people. Our novel concept of Plants' Contributions to People (PCP) provides insights into the ecological, social, and economic significance of plant biodiversity and offers a practical approach for guiding conservation efforts and policy decisions. We surveyed 99 plant species in four glacier environments in the Italian Alps; one glacier (Trobio) underwent a complete extinction in 2023 while another glacier (Amola) has a widespread surface debris cover and is proximate to extinction. We then grouped plant species into early, intermediate, and late depending on their successional stages, and then linked plants to 13 different PCP based on extensive literature research. By comparing present and projected future scenarios, we assessed the absolute and relative changes in PCP under glacier extinction. Our results show that changes in PCP are primarily driven by declining plant species richness. Most affected PCP are associated with air quality, soil health, and nutrient regulation, which decrease by sevenfold on average across plant species. Whereas natural hazards regulation showed no significant variation, association with pest and disease increases especially for late species. While future plant communities may provide PCP that are qualitatively similar to present-day communities, the volume of species-specific contributions would decrease due to biodiversity loss associated with glacier extinction. Our results provide the first evidence of PCP shift toward erosion following a decrease in plant species richness. This case study demonstrates that PCP is a valuable tool for assessing the ecological and socio-economic consequences of biodiversity change, helping raise awareness of the biodiversity crisis and inform conservation actions aimed at sustaining ecosystem functions in a rapidly changing world.

Indexed as

Alpine florabiodiversity conservationdeglaciationecosystem managementecosystem servicesNature's Contributions to Peopleplant biodiversity

Identifiers

PMID40255938
PMCPMC12006824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.