Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255929›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2025

Two sides of the same coin: person-centred systems versus person-centred nursing practice. Theory, barriers and opportunities.

Amy-Louise Byrne

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amy-Louise ByrneSenior Lecturer and Postgraduate Research Coordinator, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8679-8310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Person-centred care is a well-known concept in nursing practice. It is understood that person-centred care represents a way of providing care, which considers the person's social, emotional and physical health. Person-centred care is tailored care, which meets individual's needs, while also including them in decision-making. Aims: Despite this, the practice of person-centred care can be stifled by system constraints which impact largely on the nursing profession. This paper aims to explore such challenges, highlighting the disconnect between theory and practice. Methods: Adapted from the work of Fairclough, this discourse analysis critically reviews a cross section of texts related to person-centred care and offers a critique for discussion. Results: This paper has found a divergence between person-centred Conclusion and contribution to nursing: This paper highlights not only the challenges but also the opportunities in embedding person-centred care into system design, and considers further changes required to enable nurses to practice care which supports the whole needs of the person. It suggests that leveraging nursing expertise and experience may provide an avenue for system change.

Indexed as

nursingperson-centred caresystem redesign

Identifiers

PMID40255929
PMCPMC12003329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.