Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255903›Full record

ReviewReproductive medicine and biology

Optimizing treatment efficacy and fertility preservation in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A narrative review of ovarian shielding with total-body irradiation or treosulfan-based conditioning regimens.

Yuji Tanaka, Tetsuro Hanada, Tsukuru Amano, Akimasa Takahashi, Mari Deguchi, Hiroyuki Yamanaka, Shunichiro Tsuji, Takashi Murakami

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The experience of fertility preservation decision-making in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuji TanakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Shiga University of Medical Science Otsu Shiga Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7045-8151
Tetsuro HanadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Shiga University of Medical Science Otsu Shiga Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-9702
Tsukuru AmanoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Shiga University of Medical Science Otsu Shiga Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-6337
Akimasa TakahashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Shiga University of Medical Science Otsu Shiga Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2585-9271
Mari DeguchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Shiga University of Medical Science Otsu Shiga Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0451-3378
Hiroyuki YamanakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Shiga University of Medical Science Otsu Shiga Japan.
Shunichiro TsujiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Shiga University of Medical Science Otsu Shiga Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3945-6817
Takashi MurakamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Shiga University of Medical Science Otsu Shiga Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0250-0856

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pediatric and adolescent/young adult (AYA) patients with hematologic malignancies often require hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using conditioning regimens that pose high risks for gonadal toxicity. Traditional protocols, including total body irradiation (TBI) and busulfan-based regimens, can impair fertility. This review explores the potential of gonadal shielding during TBI and treosulfan-based conditioning as strategies to optimize treatment efficacy while preserving fertility. Methods: A PubMed search up to February 2025 was performed for English, peer-reviewed articles on hematologic malignancies, HSCT, shielding, and treosulfan. Studies on oncologic outcomes and fertility in pediatric and AYA patients were included. Main Findings: Ovarian shielding during myeloablative conditioning with TBI effectively reduces ovarian radiation exposure, resulting in improved menstrual recovery and hormone profiles. A treosulfan-based regimen demonstrated higher antitumor activity than a reduced-intensity busulfan-based regimen in randomized controlled trials. In a retrospective analysis, the treosulfan-based regimen exhibited lower gonadal toxicity than the busulfan-based regimen, although careful attention must be paid to dosing settings of the regimens. Conclusion: Ovarian shielding during TBI and a treosulfan-based regimen hold the potential to preserve the reproductive capacity of patients undergoing HSCT. Future clinical studies that appropriately assess both oncological outcomes and fertility are needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

fertility preservationhematopoietic stem cell transplantovarian shieldingpediatric patientstreosulfan

Identifiers

PMID40255903
PMCPMC12006034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.