ArticleCase reports in cardiology2025
Less Is More: Management of Left Atrial Appendage Perforation With Impending Cardiac Tamponade Following Watchman Device Placement.
Article in Case reports in cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bailout left atrial appendage occlusion as a salvage strategy for acute cardiac tamponade.HeartRhythm case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By 2030, the United States will have over 12 million people with atrial fibrillation, which carries a five-fold increase in risk of stroke. Watchman device is an alternative in patients who are poor candidates for anticoagulation. Here, we present a rare case of Watchman device implantation related to left atrial appendage (LAA) perforation noted intraoperatively with portion of the device in the pericardial space. A 93-year-old female with high fall risk and on Coumadin presented for Watchman device placement. During implantation, LAA perforation was noted with exudation of contract in the pericardium during deployment, and decision to deploy the device was made, hoping it would help seal the leak. Retrieving the device was thought to put the patient at risk of bigger perforation. Following which successful pericardial window with temporary drain placement avoided sternotomy and overall had a good outcome. A Watchman device with self-expanding frame covering the left atrial facing surface was deployed, after which a rare but potential complication of perforation was noted during delivery. The device left in place sealed the leak and prevented potential worsening incase device was retrieved. Eventually, this decision improved the outcome of the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.