Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255875›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2025

Real-World Study of Systemic Treatment after First-Line Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Asia-Pacific Countries.

Choong-Kun Lee, Changhoon Yoo, Jung Yong Hong, Se Jun Park, Jin Won Kim, David Wai Meng Tai, Hyeyeong Kim, Krittiya Korphaisarn, Suebpong Tanasanvimon, San-Chi Chen and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Chinese expert consensus on the use of standardized second-line drugs for primary hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. LenvatinibJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Choong-Kun LeeDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Changhoon YooDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jung Yong HongDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Se Jun ParkDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Jin Won KimSeoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea.
David Wai Meng TaiDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Hyeyeong KimDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea.
Krittiya KorphaisarnDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suebpong TanasanvimonKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
San-Chi ChenDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ju Won KimDivision of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Ilhwan KimDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Moonho KimDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangneung, South Korea.
Joan ChooDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Sang-Bo OhDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Yangsan Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Ching-Tso ChenNational Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Woo Kyun BaeDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea.
Hongsik KimDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, South Korea.
Seok Jae HuhDong-A University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Chia-Jui YenDepartment of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Sejung ParkSondang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Dong Ki LeeDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Landon Long ChanDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Beodeul KangDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea.
Minsu KangSeoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea.
Raghav SundarDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Hye Jin ChoiDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Stephen Lam ChanDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Hong Jae ChonDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea.
Myung-Ah LeeDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is a commonly used first-line regimen for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment owing to its superior outcomes compared to sorafenib. However, optimal subsequent treatment options for patients with HCC who progressed on first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab remain unclear. Methods: This multinational, multi-institutional, retrospective study included patients with HCC from 22 centers in five Asia-Pacific countries who were treated with first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, which was discontinued for any reason. The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to patient characteristics and second-line regimens. Results: Between June 2016 and May 2023, 1,141 patients were treated with first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, of whom 629 (55.1%) received subsequent treatment. Sorafenib and lenvatinib were the most commonly administered second-line regimens (53.9% and 25.6%, respectively). Overall, the median PFS and OS were 2.9 and 8.0 months, respectively. Lenvatinib had longer PFS (4.0 vs. 2.3 months) and OS (8.0 vs. 6.3 months) than sorafenib. Patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) ( Conclusions: In patients with HCC who progressed on first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, sorafenib and lenvatinib were the most commonly used second-line regimens in Asia-Pacific countries, with lenvatinib resulting in longer OS than sorafenib. The second-line TKI plus ICI combination exhibited promising efficacy, suggesting the potential role of continuing ICIs beyond disease progression.

Indexed as

Asia-PacificAtezolizumab plus bevacizumabHepatocellular carcinomaReal-world dataSecond-line treatment

Identifiers

PMID40255875
PMCPMC12005689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.