ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
Military aircraft noise and drug administrations in psychiatric patients: Follow-up and in-depth case-time series analysis.
Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Noise and the heart].Herz · 2026Review
- Weather, air pollution, and migraine: A case-time series analysis examining environmental exposures and transient health outcomes recorded via smartphone application.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- A structured participatory preference-tuning and VR-based framework for age-friendly spatial configuration: quantifying short-term psychophysiological responses and immediate affective states through dynamic virtual environment adaptation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In a previous study, we demonstrated that military aircraft noise increases the short-term probability of on-demand drug administrations in patients in a psychiatric clinic located in close proximity to a military airfield. The aim of this article was to: (1) apply refined exposure assessment methods; (2) compare results for various noise exposure measures reflecting different assumptions about outdoor-indoor noise attenuation and explore possible effect thresholds; and (3) conduct an independent validation study with 1 year of more recent follow-up. Methods: We conducted noise measurements during 1 year at the clinic to validate the modeled noise exposure of hourly military aircraft noise (equivalent continuous sound pressure level, Results: There was a moderate (Pearson's Conclusion: Our results suggest that predicting indoor noise levels and the addition of informed background noise estimates improves specificity in the exposure assessment and likely provides more reliable exposure-response associations. With additional follow-up data, we could confirm our previous findings that loud noise events can have acute effects on psychiatric patients' sedative drug consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.